who we arekids countcollaborativesnews and eventspublicationsstate initiatives  


EVALUATION TOOLKIT

Evaluation Toolkit
Home

Evaluation Team

FCP & Evaluation

Conducting
Evaluations

Tools & Resources

Evaluation Links

Reports & Findings

Current Hot Topics

FAQs


Back to Evaluating



FAQs: Relationship to Other Collaborative Functions

Evaluation is an integral part of all aspects of collaborative functioning. Evaluation supports the processes of planning, implementing and evaluating programs and activities, financing and budgeting, and communicating efforts to the public. Here we provide some key answers to questions that collaboratives have about evaluation's relationship to other collaborative functions.

Collaboratives want to know …

How is evaluation related to other collaborative functions?

How can evaluation support the Planning and Implementation process?

How can evaluation support the Finance and Budgeting process?

How can evaluation support the Public Affairs and Communications process?

 

 


 

How is evaluation related to other collaborative functions?

Evaluation, an applied discipline, is an integral part of all aspects of collaborative functioning. Within the typical governance structure for a local collaborative there are usually committees or task forces for Planning, Implementation and Evaluation, Finance and Budgeting and Public Will. Each of these endeavors utilizes evaluation processes or results to improve efforts, make judgments and inform the decision making process.

top


 

How can evaluation support the Planning and Implementation process?

In the planning and implementation process, evaluation strategies provide the information and data for decision-making. To determine community needs, community assessments involve a variety of evaluation strategies: secondary data review, surveys, focus groups and interviews. Based on the summary of this information in a usable format, decisions are made about community goals and benchmarks. When comprehensive community initiatives make recognizable impact on benchmarks, changes may occur in community needs. And consequently decisions are made to adopt new goals or refocus efforts or change priorities. When process or outcome evaluations show particular strategies are not reaching the desired target audiences, not reaching a sufficient number of the target audience or are not powerful enough to move the benchmarks, decisions are made to change or modify strategies for those believed to be more powerful.

top


 

How can evaluation support the Finance and Budgeting process?

Budgeting, the process of managing current funds, relies on both process and outcome evaluation processes to inform decisions. Tracking expenditures by strategy and benchmark and relating the dollars to outreach can show how much it is costing to deliver services to how many people. Thus, you have a cost to deliver factor. Relating cost to deliver figures to evidence of impact and achieved outcomes can give you a cost-effectiveness analysis. Both these evaluation processes become important tools to guide a collaborative in making decisions about which activities, programs and strategies are sound economical investments and where a collaborative might like to concentrate more of their resources. When comparing comparable strategies, (equal effectiveness at reaching the targeted audience and changing selected benchmarks) you can pick the ones that are more cost-effective.

When we think of financing as the process of securing long-term funding to support community initiatives it is apparent that evaluation processes and results are critical.

1. Foundations, government and other funders want documentation of the need for the services you're providing.

Usual methods of documentation include population statistics provided with special reference to communities and target audiences and input and feedback from target audiences using surveys, focus groups and interviews.

2. Potential funders want to know that their investment would be sound.

Providing evaluation and cost-benefit summaries of similar or pilot efforts or logic models of proposed new efforts will give convincing evidence that your collaborative should be funded.

top


 

How can evaluation support the Public Affairs and Communications process?

Evaluation strategies and evaluation processes can support the public affairs and communications process in several ways:

Relevant evaluation studies of economic impact can be very useful in educating people about the condition of children and families in their community and the potential cost to the community of not addressing the conditions.

Evaluation tools and strategies like focus groups, interviews and surveys can be used to create opportunities for people to discuss local conditions and to identify things that can be done to make improvements.

Evaluation strategies are crucial in determining the results for children and families who've been targeted by Collaborative strategies, programs and activities, and in determining the ways the system has been improved to be more efficient and effective. This becomes the Family Connection message.

top

 

family connection partnership
 
family connection partnership